Comments on: Playing with ActiveMQ http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/ There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge (Bertrand Russell) Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:30:36 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Another ActiveMQ Performance Test — ActiveMQ http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/comment-page-1/#comment-4462 Another ActiveMQ Performance Test — ActiveMQ Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:46:42 +0000 http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/#comment-4462 [...] one is posted by @bubble. The test covers throughput vs message size and throughput vs persistence. The [...] [...] one is posted by @bubble. The test covers throughput vs message size and throughput vs persistence. The [...]

]]> By: uberVU - social comments http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/comment-page-1/#comment-4450 uberVU - social comments Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:19:24 +0000 http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/#comment-4450 <strong>Social comments and analytics for this post...</strong> This post was mentioned on Twitter by bubbl: ActiveMQ : Performance http://ff.im/-aHX1V... Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by bubbl: ActiveMQ : Performance http://ff.im/-aHX1V...

]]> By: Tweets that mention Mostly useless » Blog Archive » Playing with ActiveMQ -- Topsy.com http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/comment-page-1/#comment-4447 Tweets that mention Mostly useless » Blog Archive » Playing with ActiveMQ -- Topsy.com Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:39:19 +0000 http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/#comment-4447 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by brucesnyder, Domingo Suarez. Domingo Suarez said: RT @bubbl: ActiveMQ : Performance http://ff.im/-aHX1V (via @brucesnyder) [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by brucesnyder, Domingo Suarez. Domingo Suarez said: RT @bubbl: ActiveMQ : Performance http://ff.im/-aHX1V (via @brucesnyder) [...]

]]> By: Brad Peabody http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/comment-page-1/#comment-2362 Brad Peabody Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:02:36 +0000 http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/#comment-2362 Unfortunately, in my experience, ActiveMQ has a great feature set but suffers from reliability issues. There is one specific app that I wrote a year ago and it's interaction with ActiveMQ has been one of the biggest support nightmares ever since. The main issue has been around how it handles message delivery failure, i.e. the receiving end of the message queue does database work and the database goes down for an hour and so message delivery is failing - database comes back up but messages don't empty from the queue - plus other instances of it just more or less randomly stopping delivery. Maybe it's my app or other network-related issues - but my personal experience with ActiveMQ is that it is not really solid production-quality code. But, in all fairness, it could just be the way I'm using it. Unfortunately, in my experience, ActiveMQ has a great feature set but suffers from reliability issues. There is one specific app that I wrote a year ago and it’s interaction with ActiveMQ has been one of the biggest support nightmares ever since. The main issue has been around how it handles message delivery failure, i.e. the receiving end of the message queue does database work and the database goes down for an hour and so message delivery is failing – database comes back up but messages don’t empty from the queue – plus other instances of it just more or less randomly stopping delivery. Maybe it’s my app or other network-related issues – but my personal experience with ActiveMQ is that it is not really solid production-quality code. But, in all fairness, it could just be the way I’m using it.

]]> By: Hussain http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/comment-page-1/#comment-1219 Hussain Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:19:45 +0000 http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/#comment-1219 Hi Simone, Thanks for sharing your data on ActiveMQ. We are trying to enqueue messages inside tomcat but the call queueSender#send blocks indefinetly. Surprisingly the same code works on a different machine. What can be the cause of this problem ? Thanks, Hussain Code : ActiveMQConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory("", "", "tcp://192.168.98.141:61616"); javax.jms.QueueConnection connection = connectionFactory.createQueueConnection(); queueSession = connection.createQueueSession(false, QueueSession.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE); javax.jms.Queue queue = queueSession.createQueue(queueName); QueueSender sender = queueSession.createSender(queue); TextMessage message2 = queueSession.createTextMessage(); message2.setText(message); // set some props message2.setStringProperty(ICPWSConsts.ICP_CUSTOMERID_PROP, customerIdentifier); message2.setStringProperty(ICPWSConsts.ICP_INTERFACE_VER_PROP, ICPWSConsts.ICP_INTERFACE_VER); message2.setStringProperty(ICPWSConsts.INPUT_SOURCE_PROP, ICPWSConsts.INPUT_SOURCE); message2.setStringProperty(ICPWSConsts.ICP_TPID_PROP, tpID); sender.send(message2); if(connection!=null) connection.close(); Hi Simone,

Thanks for sharing your data on ActiveMQ.
We are trying to enqueue messages inside tomcat but the call queueSender#send blocks indefinetly. Surprisingly the same code works on a different machine.

What can be the cause of this problem ?

Thanks,
Hussain

Code :

ActiveMQConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(“”, “”, “tcp://192.168.98.141:61616″);
javax.jms.QueueConnection connection = connectionFactory.createQueueConnection();

queueSession = connection.createQueueSession(false, QueueSession.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
javax.jms.Queue queue = queueSession.createQueue(queueName);
QueueSender sender = queueSession.createSender(queue);
TextMessage message2 = queueSession.createTextMessage();
message2.setText(message);

// set some props message2.setStringProperty(ICPWSConsts.ICP_CUSTOMERID_PROP, customerIdentifier);
message2.setStringProperty(ICPWSConsts.ICP_INTERFACE_VER_PROP, ICPWSConsts.ICP_INTERFACE_VER);
message2.setStringProperty(ICPWSConsts.INPUT_SOURCE_PROP, ICPWSConsts.INPUT_SOURCE);
message2.setStringProperty(ICPWSConsts.ICP_TPID_PROP, tpID);

sender.send(message2);
if(connection!=null)
connection.close();

]]> By: simone http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/comment-page-1/#comment-99 simone Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:50:36 +0000 http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/#comment-99 You know, I have to honor that "mostly" in the big title ;) You know, I have to honor that “mostly” in the big title ;)

]]> By: michele http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/comment-page-1/#comment-98 michele Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:00:27 +0000 http://www.mostly-useless.com/blog/2007/12/27/playing-with-activemq/#comment-98 Well, I'm not sure this qualifies as "useless knowledge"... ;-) Well, I’m not sure this qualifies as “useless knowledge”… ;-)

]]>