Posted on Sunday, March 2, 2008
Filed Under (Culture) by simone

Miro

Yesterday I went to see Miró: la terra, an exposition dedicated to the Catalan artist held at Palazzo dei Diamanti. This was my second attempt with Miró. The first was many years ago – I was still in primary school – the teacher brought us to the exposition and tried hard to make us understand what’s behind the surface of such apparently simple and meaningless sketches. That time she failed. Luckily enough, now I’m grown up. After so many years, watching Miró’s painting had a totally different effect on me and, even if I know little about art.  At least this time I could appreciate the message conveyed.

The exposition is laid out in a way that allows you to follow the artist’s mental path while he mutated style and obsessions along his life. It goes from the usual detailed description down to the totally surreal, purely symbolic, conceptual, two-dimensional, synthetic and ironic deconstruction of both reality and painted art itself.

Most paintings are a little cryptic and require you to stare at them a few minutes before you begin to recognize all the symbols and why different materials were used to build that meaning. Look at this one, “Catalan landscape: the hunter” (from MoMA New York), painted in 1923-24 when the artist was in the early stages of his career. We see a rural landscape, with yellow sunny sky and unshaped land. That triangle on the upper left is the head of a man, with one eye, one ear, a strange hat (the traditional Catalan barretina), mustaches, beard, a pipe. His body is a vertical thin line ending in a squared thin line for his legs. Arms are rendered by a wavy horizontal. In his right hand is has a prey and in the left a smoking rifle. In the bottom part a big fish (a sardine, says the paint) is partly morphed in a lizard and tries to capture a fly with a long tongue.

Note how the artist hints us at the meaning behind symbols, using a surprisingly low number of carefully selected signs. That big eye, partly hidden behind what could be a tree with one single leaf, is looking at us. Is that Miró himself, amused by the feelings this painting generated in the watcher?

Comments

Stefano on 2 March, 2008 at 14:10 UTC #

Personally, I don’t think this is a type of art for me. I think that art should convey me an emotion. This does not convey me anything but a sense of “damn, this guy spent its whole life drawing stuff I could do as well, and then he sat down and let people wonder what he meant”. The greatest probably being Jackson Pollock.

You don’t have to understand or being explained something to get an emotion out of it. And even after you explained that painting, I still see a bunch of random stuff.


simone on 2 March, 2008 at 19:13 UTC #

Well, I liked it. That’s all I know.
I’m no expert and I never studied art in my life, so I guess the emotion is there, just to be uncovered. Don’t despair: as I said it took me two attempts.


[...] comment deserved a longer answer, so here is a full post on the [...]


Post a Comment
Name:
Email:
Website:
Comments: